- Framework of problems / Transparent
- Errors in systematic review abstracts or plain language summaries
- Assessment of the abstract reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analysis: a literature survey
Ref ID | 439 |
First Author | P. L. Jia |
Journal | BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY |
Year Of Publishing | 2019 |
URL | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631883/pdf/12874_2019_Article_798.pdf |
Keywords |
Abstract / summary General medical |
Problem(s) |
Errors in systematic review abstracts or plain language summaries |
Number of systematic reviews included | 529 |
Summary of Findings | There was moderate compliance with PRISMA-A with the poorest adherence for protocol registration (0.57%); funding information (2%); methods of risk of bias assessment (30%); brief summary of evidence (36%) and results of risk of bias assessment (49%). |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |