Assessment of the abstract reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analysis: a literature survey

Ref ID 439
First Author P. L. Jia
Journal BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2019
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631883/pdf/12874_2019_Article_798.pdf
Keywords Abstract / summary
General medical
Problem(s) Errors in systematic review abstracts or plain language summaries
Number of systematic reviews included 529
Summary of Findings There was moderate compliance with PRISMA-A with the poorest adherence for protocol registration (0.57%); funding information (2%); methods of risk of bias assessment (30%); brief summary of evidence (36%) and results of risk of bias assessment (49%).
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes