- Framework of problems / Transparent
- Errors in systematic review abstracts or plain language summaries
- Has the Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts in Nursing Improved Since the Release of PRISMA for Abstracts? A Survey of High-Profile Nursing Journals
Ref ID | 803 |
First Author | W. Jiancheng |
Journal | WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING |
Year Of Publishing | 2020 |
URL | https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/wvn.12414?casa_token=2oodflwcdEoAAAAA%3AMX8zmgWVIhMeUa0xc8X3kEkSLKI1jz6TFXhlh0rUoHtcI-AeUKIwFYdQm5qg_-TVTCpDlcXL-aUYQxwS |
Keywords |
Abstract / summary Nursing |
Problem(s) |
Errors in systematic review abstracts or plain language summaries |
Number of systematic reviews included | 81 |
Summary of Findings | Full access to this paper is behind a paywall. Of 81 included systematic reviews of nursing indexed on PubMed, about half reported eligibility criteria, information sources, and description of the effect as recommended in the abstract (PRISMA-A). Registration status was reported only in 4.9%. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | No |