- Framework of problems / Transparent
- Errors in systematic review abstracts or plain language summaries
- Over 30% of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Focused on Rotator Cuff Tear Treatments Contained Spin in the Abstract
|Year Of Publishing
Abstract / summary
Spin or subjective interpretation of findings
Errors in systematic review abstracts or plain language summaries
|Number of systematic reviews included
|Summary of Findings
|From 121 abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatments for rotator cuff tears published in Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Embase, 36.4% (44/121) of systematic reviews contained spin.
|Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results?
|Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?