- Framework of problems / Transparent
- Selective reporting of harms / safety / adverse events / side effects
- Harms Reporting Is Inadequate in Systematic Reviews Regarding Hip Arthroscopy
| Ref ID | 900 |
| First Author | C. Peters |
| Journal | ARTHROSCOPY, SPORTS MEDICINE, AND REHABILITATION |
| Year Of Publishing | 2023 |
| URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X22001687?via%3Dihub |
| Keywords |
• Orthopaedic • Low reporting quality • Musculoskeletal • Surgery • Harms |
| Problem(s) |
• Selective reporting of harms / safety / adverse events / side effects • Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 82 |
| Summary of Findings | From 82 included systematic reviews of hip arthroscopy indexed across MEDLINE (PubMed and Ovid), EMBASE, Epistemonikos, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in May 2022. Of these, 37 (45.1%) reported under 50% of the harms criteria and 9 (10.9%) did not report harms at all. The methodological quality (AMSTAR-2) ratings were critically low in 60 reviews (73.2%) and low in 17 (20.7%). |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | N/A |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |