- Framework of problems / Transparent
- Financial conflicts of interest of review authors
Articles that support this problem:
Financial Conflicts of Interest and Reporting Bias Regarding the Association between Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Weight Gain: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
2014 : Plos medicine
Financial conflicts of interest in systematic reviews: associations with results, conclusions, and methodological quality
2019 : Cochrane database of systematic reviews
When trial authors write Cochrane Reviews: competing interests need to be better managed
2014 : Cochrane database of systematic reviews
How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
2016 : Bmj open
Financial conflicts of interest and conclusions about neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: an analysis of systematic reviews
2014 : Annals of internal medicine
Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest in systematic reviews on health policy and systems research: a cross sectional survey
2018 : International journal of health policy and management
Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: a systematic review
2009 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects
2006 : Bmc medical research methodology
Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses?
2012 : Bmj
The Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias
2018 : Bmj evidence-based medicine
Conclusions in systematic reviews of mammography for breast cancer screening and associations with review design and author characteristics
2017 : Systematic reviews
Lessons learnt on transparency, scientific process and publication ethics. The short story of a long journey to get into the public domain unpublished data, methodological flaws and bias of the Cochrane HPV vaccines review
2019 : Bmj evidence-based medicine
Alcohol, cardiovascular disease and industry funding: A co-authorship network analysis of systematic reviews
2021 : Social science & medicine
Association between industry sponsorship and author conflicts of interest with outcomes of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interventions for opioid use disorder
2022 : Journal of substance abuse treatment
Association between author conflicts of interest and industry-sponsorship with the favorability of outcomes of systematic reviews focusing on treatments of erectile dysfunction
2021 : Andrology
Do Author Conflicts of Interest and Industry Sponsorship Influence Outcomes of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Regarding Glaucoma Interventions? A Cross-sectional Analysis
2021 : Journal of glaucoma
Striking Errors in the Methodology, Execution, and Conclusions of the Cochrane Library Review of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Low Back Pain by Traeger et al
2023 : Pain medicine
Characteristics and methodological standards across systematic reviews with Meta-analysis of efficacy and/or effectiveness of influenza vaccines: an overview of reviews
2022 : Infectious diseases
Impact of industry sponsorship on the quality of systematic reviews of vaccines: a cross-sectional analysis of studies published from 2016 to 2019
2022 : Systematic reviews
Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for polycystic ovary syndrome: An overview of systematic reviews
2023 : The journal of integrative medicine